Presented by: Scott Forbes, Vice President of Operations, Criterium Engineers
Other info:
- International Codes Council to learn more about building codes related to this topic
- Topics of interest at Criterium Engineers
Taxpayers who spent at least $500,000 to purchase, build or renovate a building in the last 15 years may be sitting on a huge tax benefit. How do they find out? They do a cost segregation study.
Depreciation enters significantly into the financial performance of commercial buildings. Typically, property, exclusive of land, is depreciated over 39 years. Certain improvements or renewable materials (e.g., carpets) may be depreciated more quickly. These calculations have been part of the financial landscape for years.
What is not as generally known is that many of the costs embedded in a new, or even an existing, building can be segregated into categories that also allow for more rapid depreciation. This tax benefit is not new but is often overlooked by building owners and even many of their accountants.
If you own a commercial or apartment building that has been bought, built or reonovated recently without a Cost Segregation Study (CSS), you may have missed a significant opportunity for cash savings. the good news is, you still may be able to utilize this modern tax planning tool. CSS is the latest element added to the typical due diligence process of having a consulting engineer perform a building inspection with an optional environmental site assessment.
Whereas due diligence focuses on reducing future liabilities of physical or environmental problems with a property, a CSS focuses on impriving the project’s cash flow through reclassifcation of the property’s asset lives with the purpose of accelerating depreciation expenses, and thus lowering federal taxes.
The benefit of a CSS can be substantial, with potential net present value savings of more than $50,000 for every $1 million of property value.
Even if years have passed since purchasing the property, the IRS allows the taxpayer to recapture lost depreciation all in one year without having to file amended returns by simply filing Form 3115 to notify the IRS of the change in accounting after the retroactive CSS.
Though the advantages of improved cash flow in the early years of a real estate investment are obvious, many side benefits of a CSS are realized in multi-tenant properties.
When a tenant prematurely vacates a space, a CSS can be used as the basis to document the value of the space’s assets to be written-off and to use the tax savings to fund marketing of the space or future tenant fit-up.
All real estate investors have different tax circumstances, therefore, it is very prudent to obtain the advice of your tax consultant before initiating a CSS.
Most of the area’s commercial brokers and accounting firms are becoming familiar with this powerful tool. After a little research, the rewards can be very worthwhile.
Cost Segregation Studies (CSS) are designed to provide a defensible document to support accelerated depreciation of real estate. The purpose is to reclassify 39-year assets to more tax-favorable asset classes with 5-, 7- or 15-year lives. By converting “brick and mortar” assets (depreciated in a straight-line method over 39 years) to “personal property” assets (depreciated on a double-declining basis over 5 years), the real estate owner receives earlier tax depreciation expenses, thereby improving the cashflow from the property. The benefits of a CSS are best measured in Net Present Value (NPV) savings. Typical examples of personal property include architectural millwork, electrical and plumbing supply to personal property, movable partitions, security systems, exhaust equipment, decorative lighting, emergency generators, land improvements, signage, wall and floor coverings and window treatments.
The table below provides an example of potential savings:
SHOPPING CENTER EXAMPLE
Personal Property | 5 yr 200% db | – | 0% | $600,000 | 12% |
Personal Property | 7 yr 200% db | – | 0% | – | 0% |
Land Improvements | 15 yr 150% db | – | 0% | $1,000,000 | 20% |
Real Property | 39 yr sl | $5,000,000 | 100% | $3,400,000 | 68% |
_________________ | __________ | _____ | __________ | _____ | |
TOTAL | $5,000,000 | 100% | $5,000,000 | 100% |
Cost Segregation Studies began to be performed in earnest following the IRS issuance of Rev. Proc. 96-31 in 1996, which allowed taxpayers to correct mistakes in the depreciation of their assets. After several minor tax court cases were found in favor of taxpayers using CSS methods, the IRS accepted this procedure. What gives the true strength to the taxpayer’s position is that the tax courts have ruled that the case law created for the Investment Tax Credit, before the ITC’s demise in 1986, is applicable to CSS methods. As a result, CPAs have felt comfortable with the estimating and asset life reclassification that occurs in a CSS report.
A CSS is most applicable to buildings that are newly built, newly acquired, or about to be acquired. Newly constructed buildings are ready candidates because material and construction costs have generally been calculated already. Recently acquired existing buildings are also good candidates if a significant amount of depreciation has not already been taken. Even after a few years, assets that should have been reclassified can be recaptured in the current tax year. A CSS also makes excellent sense during the due diligence phase for new acquisitions. At the time that they perform a Property Condition Assessment (PCA), your consultant may also be able to perform a CSS. This approach not only saves times and money, and sets you up to depreciate your asset properly from the beginning, it also may factor into the purchase price, enabling buyers to be more competitive.
Real estate investments best suited to undergo a Cost Segregation Study include:
Properties with the best savings potential include:
The IRS requires a detailed study by “experts” to support claims for shorter recovery periods. These experts must be judged as independent (performing Cost Segregation Studies on your own is strongly discouraged) and have the credibility to be able to estimate costs reliably. That is why most Cost Segregation Studies are performed by engineering companies, often in concert with an accounting firm or the client’s CPA.
The CSS can be conducted in parallel with a Property Condition Report, an Environmental Site Assessment, or done independently. An engineering firm reviews available site plans, construction drawings, purchase documents, and other information to assign values and classify the assets. Through site visits and document reviews, a determination of the value of the land and building is made. The CSS team then “dissects” the property to identify all personal property, reclassify the assets, and develop engineering estimates of their value. This includes estimating building systems that are not visible such as buried utility systems and those hidden behind walls, floors and ceilings. Soft costs that are capitalized are also considered in the reclassification analysis. All personal property assets are categorized as needed, and tabulated into summary statements for the client’s CPA to use for tax filing. Results for the current tax year for new purchases are entered per Rev. Proc. 2002-19. For a prior year’s purchase, there is no need to amend the prior year’s returns or K-1s. The CPA files an “automatic” Form 3115 to advise the IRS of the method change. Please call Criterium Engineers for a quote.
The Engineering Advisor is intended to enhance your knowledge of technical issues relating to buildings. For additional information on any subject, please feel free to call us. Our commitment is to provide you with timely, accurate information.
More information on CSS and you can check out our Cost Segregation Study services
Buyers of commercial real estate are concerned with the financing and economics of their acquisition. Until recently, the condition of the building was only a relatively minor concern. That is changing with PCA due diligence.
The initial impetus for carefully evaluating the condition of the building were the failures and foreclosures at the start of the decade. Financial institutions were forced to deal with buildings that were not maintained and needed substantial work.
Next, regulations such as The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) created certain imperatives for building owners to upgrade facilities. Seismic codes were, and continue to be re-written. New environmental and ecological concerns surfaced.
Then, changes in the way buildings are financed created a need for a more formal and complete look at the condition of the building and the capital reserves required to maintain it. As more commercial mortgages are securitized, the rating agencies on Wall Street – Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, etc. – now require that property condition surveys be part of the due diligence process.
The Evolution of a Practice
The first type of engineering service to be almost universally required was the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Initially, there was no standard for the service. Vague requirements made it difficult for commercial developers, owners, and financial institutions to be confident that their environmental due diligence would be defensible in court. Enter the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the development of E1527: Practice for Environmental Site Assessments.
Property condition surveys and reserve studies have not yet become so standardized. Firms in the business, each have their own format. Each financial institution has their own scope. FannieMae and FreddieMac individually created their own guidelines for multifamily properties.
Appropriate qualifications have not been defined. Financial institutions require firms are acceptable to the rating companies. The rating companies look to the financial institutions to select qualified firms. Finding the best firm for the job can be difficult.
But things are changing, just as they did for environmental inspections. The effort at standardization is being driven by the rating companies themselves. Standard formats have been developed. Most engineers in the field are aware of these formats and can provide them in a timely fashion.
Such consistency enables the engineer to understand the scope of services requested, and makes it easier for all to review the reports. Some of the key features of the engineering study are:
What to Expect in the Future of PCA Due Diligence
With PCA Due Diligence, clear expectations for both environmental and engineering services, commercial building owners, buyers, and financial institutions can expect to see some significant changes in the way service is provided.
First, necessary services are being consolidated under one roof. Buyers can now purchase both engineering surveys and environmental assessments from the same company. Consolidation simplifies the process, reduces costs, and shortens the time frame in which services are provided. Criterium Engineers has offered both services for a number of years. Firms are looking to consolidate other services as well, such as appraisals and surveys.
The second trend is to provide broad geographic coverage. Firms experienced in this work have tended to have only one or a very few offices. That required that they send people all over the region or country. The result was higher cost and lower quality since the engineer was not necessarily familiar with local conditions. Companies that specialize in this work are now trying to build networks to cover broader geographic areas. The Criterium network of 65 national offices – 6 in northern New England – is a perfect vehicle for providing high quality, rapid and consistent service, at an affordable rate.
How Can I Be Sure of Getting the Best Service?
There are a number of things that owners and buyers can do to ensure the best and most expedient service.
Learn more about our PCA services.
Who would think venting a unit’s clothes dryer was so complicated? When was the last time the cleanliness of dryer vents was on your Board’s meeting agenda? Yet, clothes dryers may be one of the most dangerous appliances in the home. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission reports there are more than 15,000 home fires each year directly related to dryer maintenance and overheating with blocked exhaust venting contributing to half of those fires. Dryer venting falls in the category of what you can’t see, can hurt you.
Safety Tip: Prevent dryer fires by cleaning the dryer vent, exhaust duct and lint screen/filter periodically.
— US Consumer Product Safety Commission (@USCPSC) May 26, 2017
Just as condo units and their buildings come in many shapes and sizes, so does dryer vent systems. It is not unusual for new Boards not only not understand the exact nature of their condo’s in-unit dryer vent system but they also are not certain who is responsible for its maintenance. Most dryer vent ducts pass through common space, except for HOA unit owners who are responsible for their own building envelope and everything within. Some condo dryer vent ducts are dedicated to a given unit while others are shared with other units. Many dryers vent pass through an exterior wall while mid-rise and high-rise condo buildings share a vertical rooftop vent system.
With these different types of systems and variances often found in the governing condo documents, it is not always well understood by the Board members who is responsible for maintenance and repair of dryer duct systems. This includes basic routine cleaning even if it is clear maintaining the in-unit dryer is part of the unit owner’s responsibility. This is an important issue to resolve with the assistance of your legal counsel, as it is the first step in meeting the Board’s responsibility to oversee the safety of the units’ venting system and its occupants.
Once dryer vent system maintenance responsibilities are understood, a policy should be put in place. This policy should provide authority for unit access and performing maintenance and repairs when owners fail to comply with the dryer policy including assessing charges to the unit owner incurred by the association in providing the required dryer maintenance. The policy should specify the required maintenance including cleaning of the dryer vents and ducts on a scheduled basis, typically every two years. Often communities will engage a dryer maintenance contractor at a bulk rate to provide a cost effective and consistent maintenance program. Should a unit owner opt out of this service they would be required to provide proof of compliance of the required maintenance being conducted by others.
Before the dryer maintenance program can be implemented, the Board must understand their system. This may require the assistance of a maintenance repair contractor or the association’s building engineer who will need to inspect the present system. This inspection may reveal common and shared duct systems; long duct runs with booster in-line fans; improper duct materials. As an example, any vent duct found to be vinyl, PVC, or flexible is a problem. Most of these types of vent ducts are violations of the local and national building codes, as their interior surfaces collect lint creating a build up of highly flammable material as well as a medium to collect water whose weight can bend duct pipe and create an environment susceptible to mildew and mold. Improper duct should be removed and replaced with smooth-walled metal ductwork. If flexible duct is found forming an elbow at the rear of the dryer, it should be replaced with non-flexible metal elbow duct so as not to be crushed when the dryer is pushed against the wall.
The policy may set specifications on the type of dryers to be allowed in units. Not all dryers are the same. Beyond the differences between electric and gas-fired dryers, some dryers have significantly different exhaust characteristics. Building codes recognizes this by allowing the manufacturer to specify the maximum length of straight vent duct to be used. This typically can range from 15 to 90 feet. This duct length is further defined by reducing the allowable length by 5 feet for every 90 degree bend and 2 ½ feet for every 45 degree bend in the duct. For this reason, the policy should provide specific direction to unit owners of the minimum type of dryer performance allowed as well as advising the unit owner of the length of duct the dryer will be connected. Some associations even place a placard at the duct wall connection with this information for future dryer installations.
In hiring the dryer maintenance contractor the Board should take the normal insurance precautions as when hiring any contractor, including coverage for general liability; automobile liability; workers compensation and umbrella liability coverage with key required endorsements. These are needed to protect the association from both having to defend itself as well as pay damages as a result of the contractor’s activities while also including additional insured endorsements; waiver of subrogation endorsement; and primary/non-contributory wording.
The contract with the maintenance contractor should specify the method of cleaning the dryer duct. Typically the cleaning is a combination of extendable brushes and vacuum cleaning. The scope of work should include specific clarification of disposal of duct debris both inside and outside the building. Safety issues should be addressed, particularly regarding movement of gas-fired dryers.
Dryer vents maintenance policy can include some preventative maintenance guidance to unit owners. Unit owners should be advised to report unusual dryer performance including longer than normal drying times or the dryer surface or clothes feeling hotter than normal. The owners should also report their observations of the outside louver on their dryer vents not opening as much as before. Excessive humid or burnt smells in the laundry area are all signs of blocked exhaust vent duct. The recognition of dryer malfunctions and a good preventive maintenance policy will ensure the common safety for all.
Dryer Vents are just one aspect we inspect in our Home Owners Association Services.